Portillo-Escobar

Portillo-Escobar v. Holder

Good Law
444 F. App'x 992
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 201107-71998California1,540 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Rosa Maria Portillo-Escobar, a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision that she abandoned her lawful permanent resident (LPR) status in the United States. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition.

Whether a permanent resident abandoned her LPR status is reviewed under the substantial evidence standard. Khodagholian v. Ashcroft, 335 F.3d 1003, 1006 (9th Cir.2003) (citing Chavez-Ramirez v. INS, 792 F.2d 932, 934-35 (9th Cir.1986)). “To reverse under the substantial evidence standard, the evidence must be so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the facts were as the alien alleged.” Khodagholian, 335 F.3d at 1006 (citing Singh v. Reno, 113 F.3d 1512, 1514 (9th Cir.1997) (citing INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992))).

“When an applicant has a colorable claim to returning resident status, as [Por-tillo-Escobar] does, the INS has the burden of proving [she] is not eligible for admission to the United States.” Singh, 113 F.3d at 1514 . That burden “is to establish by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.