Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass'n

Good Law
647 F.3d 893·2011 WL 3074809·41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20246·80 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 30·2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15356
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 201110-35823California3,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

Three conservation groups, Montana Wilderness Association, Greater Yellowstone Coalition, and The Wilderness Society (collectively, “Applicants”) appeal from the denial of their motion to intervene on the side of the defendants in an action brought by Citizens for Balanced Use (“CBU”) against Mary Erickson, in her official capacity as Supervisor of the Gallatin National Forest, and the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”). In the underlying action, CBU challenged an interim order issued by the Forest Service in response to an adverse decision in prior litigation brought by Applicants. That interim order, which is the subject of this litigation, restricted motorized and mechanized vehicle use in a section of the Gallatin National Forest. CBU alleged that the challenged interim order violated the Montana Wilderness Study Act of 1977 (“MWSA”) and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) because it unduly restricted the use or possession of snowmobiles, tracked ATVs, and other over-snow vehicles. Because we conclude that Applicants satisfied the four requirements for intervention as of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a), we reverse and remand with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.