United States v. Gaspar Torres-Hernandez

Good Law
446 F. App'x 35
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 201110-10367California205 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

On October 29, 2009, defendant Gasper Torres-Hernandez was arrested in Arizona and charged with one count of illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). Torres-Hernandez pled guilty without the benefit of a plea agreement in the District Court for the District of Arizona (Collins, J.), which thereafter sentenced him to a 30-month term of incarceration. We affirm.

Viewing the record as a whole, it is clear that the district court did consider, under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), Torres-Hernandez’s motive for returning to the United States. Moreover, the district court adequately explained that this consideration was the reason for its downward departure from the Guidelines range of 51 to 63 months. See United States v. Autery, 555 F.3d 864, 869-870 (9th Cir.2009). Finally, the Court concludes that, in light of the totality of circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), the district court’s sentence was substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

The Court has considered all of Torres-Hernandez’s other arguments and found them to be without merit.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.