Jachetta

Jachetta v. United States

Good Law
653 F.3d 898·2011 WL 3250450·2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15808
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 201110-35175California6,380 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bybee, J.

In 1971, William Carlo Jachetta applied for a 160-acre Native allotment comprised of two parcels (Parcel A and Parcel B) but, because of an error of the United States government, his application was initially processed only as a request for Parcel A, which the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) issued to Jachetta in 1986. In 2004, after long and complicated administrative proceedings, the BLM finally issued Jachetta his allotment for Parcel B. By this time, however, Parcel B had been used as a “material site” by the State of Alaska Department of Transportation (“Alaska” or the “State”) and by the Alyes-ka Pipeline Service Company (“Alyeska”) who, among other things, had extracted over 700,000 cubie yards of gravel from the allotment. Dissatisfied with the physical condition of Parcel B, Jachetta sued the BLM, Alaska, and Alyeska in federal court, alleging causes of action for inverse condemnation, injunctive relief, nuisance, breach of fiduciary duties, and civil rights violations. The district court dismissed Jachetta’s action against the BLM and Alaska on the basis of sovereign immunity, and Jachetta appeals the dismissal to this court. We hold that sovereign immunity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.