Rosanes

Rosanes v. Holder

Good Law
446 F. App'x 830
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 201107-72704California344 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Arnel Pavón Rosanes (“Rosanes”), a native and citizen of the Philippines and lawful permanent resident of the United States, petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision that he was removable pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) ( 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(A)(iii)), for having committed an aggravated felony in 1987. The BIA held that Rosanes was additionally removable pursuant to INA § 237(a)(2)(A)(ii) ( 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(A)(ii)) for having committed two crimes involving moral turpitude (“CIMT”), one being the failure to register as a sex offender under California law.

Several significant legal changes have occurred since the BIA issued its decision in this case. In Ledezma-Galicia v. Holder, 636 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir.2010), we concluded that neither the Immigration Act of 1990 nor the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 impliedly repealed a prospective-only provision of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, which made aliens deportable for aggravated felony convictions that took place on or after November 18, 1988. Id. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.