Edgardo Antonio Lopez Salazar v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
445 F. App'x 974
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 201108-73961California392 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Edgardo Antonio Lopez Salazar, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that the threatened kid-naping at Lopez’s school and the disturbance at his grandmother’s house, even considered cumulatively and viewed from Lopez’s perspective as a child, do not rise to the level of past persecution. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003) (unfulfilled threats “constitute harassment rather than persecution”); see also Hernandez-Ortiz v. Gonzales, 496 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, because the BIA determined that Lopez failed to establish past persecution, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in rejecting his claim for humanitarian asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.