Pablo Dominguez-Salmeron v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
445 F. App'x 977
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 201109-73540California206 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Pablo Dominguez-Salmeron, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s continuous physical presence determination, Vera-Villegas v. INS, 330 F.3d 1222, 1230 (9th Cir.2003), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Dominguez-Salmeron’s contention that the IJ failed to make an explicit adverse credibility determination because Dominguez-Sal-meron did not exhaust this contention before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s continuous physical presence determination because the record does not compel the conclusion that Dominguez-Salmeron was present in the United States from January 15, 1992 to January 15, 2002. See Pedro-Mateo v. INS, 224 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.2000) (a contrary result is not compelled “when it is possible to draw two inconsistent conclusions from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.