United States v. Martin Chavez-Cuevas

Good Law
445 F. App'x 978
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 201110-30305California307 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Federal prisoner Martin Chavez-Cuevas appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of audita querela pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Chavez-Cuevas contends that the district court erred in concluding that a writ of audita querela was unavailable to him. He argues that the writ is available here because it is the only means for him to obtain the relief to which he claims he is entitled under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

“[A] federal prisoner may not challenge his or her sentence pursuant to a petition for a writ of audita querela if the requested relief can be obtained under [28 U.S.C.] § 2255.” United States v. Gamboa, 608 F.3d 492, 492 (9th Cir.2010). Because Chavez-Cuevas’s challenge to the legality of his sentence is cognizable under section 2255, the instant petition was properly denied.

The fact that a section 2255 motion may have been untimely does not make the writ of audita querela available to Chavez-Cue-vas. See United States v. Valdez-Pacheco, 237 F.3d 1077, 1080 (9th Cir.2001) (per curiam) (“A prisoner may not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.