Chao Zhou v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
446 F. App'x 871
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 9, 201110-71288California236 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Chao Yung Zhou, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen exclusion proceedings held in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, He v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1128, 1130-31 (9th Cir.2007), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Zhou’s motion to reopen exclusion proceedings held in absentia where Zhou failed to show reasonable cause for his failure to appear. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 (b)(4)(iii)(B).

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Zhou’s motion to reopen to apply for asylum as untimely because he filed it more than fifteen years after the entry of his final exclusion order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 (b)(1), and he failed to demonstrate changed country conditions to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 (b)(4)(i); He, 501 F.3d at 1132-33 (change in personal circumstances alone is “not sufficient to establish changed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.