German Tello Torres v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
446 F. App'x 884
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 201108-72150California199 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

German Tello Torres and Alejandra Lugo Lujano, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir.2008). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that the motion to reopen’s additional evidence of hardship was insufficient to establish a prima facie case of the hardship required for cancellation of removal. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 600-603 (9th Cir.2006).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen based on the new evidence regarding violence in Mexico because petitioners did not demonstrate prima facie eligibility for the relief sought. See Toufighi, 538 F.3d at 996-97 ; see also Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 965-66 (9th Cir.2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.