Fernando Aranda v. Elizabeth Meyers
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 201110-17304California266 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 10 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FERNANDO ARANDA, No. 10-17304
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01434-GEB-
DAD
v.
ELIZABETH MEYERS; et al., MEMORANDUM *
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 2, 2011 **
Before: RYMER, IKUTA, and N. R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Fernando Aranda, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district
court’s order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Andrews v. Cervantes,
493 F.3d 1047, 1052 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly…