Howard

Howard v. CRIMINAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.

Good Law
654 F.3d 887·2011 WL 3559940
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 201110-35751, 10-35779California2,277 words

Opinion

Opinion

Clifton, J.

These appeals involve two essentially identical actions filed in two different states, Oregon and Washington, by different groups of Plaintiffs, each of which seeks to represent a class. The actions seek damages on the ground that Plaintiffs’ personal information was obtained by Defendants in violation of the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (“DPPA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2721-2725 . That statute provides that personal information from state driver license databases can be obtained, disclosed, or used only for certain specified purposes. Each of the Defendants purchased driver record information in bulk so it would have the information available for its future use. Plaintiffs do not complain that the ultimate use of the information by any of the Defendants was for purposes not permitted under the DPPA. They argue, however, that the DPPA forbids bulk purchasing of drivers’ personal information for future use because obtaining the information for future use is not itself a permitted purpose under the DPPA. Joining other courts which have dealt with similar claims, we conclude that Defendants’ actions were not unlawful under the DPPA and affirm the dismissal of the actions by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.