United States v. Eric Willoughby

Good Law
447 F. App'x 816
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 201110-10384California160 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Eric Lamont Willoughby appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 36-month sentence for bank robbery and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2113(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Willoughby’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.