United States v. Allen Donahue
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 201110-10004California227 words
Opinion
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED
AUG 17 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10004
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:08-cr-01070-RCC-
CRP-
v. District of Arizona, Tucson
ALLEN MICHAEL DONAHUE,
Defendant - Appellant. ORDER
Before: GOULD and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, Senior District Judge.*
We recall the mandate, which issued prematurely on February 8, 2011.
On January 14, 2011, we filed a memorandum disposition retaining
appellate jurisdiction and remanding to the district court with instructions to
answer two questions. The district court issued an order on August 1, 2011,
answering those questions. In light of the district court’s order, we affirm. Because
at trial the district court “had the opportunity to do exactly what [it] would have
done had [it] held an evidentiary hearing” and “understood that suppression was on
the table,” and because the court’s order clarifies that it would have denied a
* The Honorable Edward R. Korman, Senior United States…