Claudia Campos Perez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
447 F. App'x 855
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 201110-71031California249 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Claudia Campos Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying her motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and we review de novo questions of law, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion by denying Campos Perez’s motion to reopen on the ground that she failed to show her prior counsel was ineffective. See Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 899-900 . It follows that Campos Perez’s due process claim fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Campos Perez’s contention regarding the transcript of her removal hearing because she did not raise that claim before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677 (9th Cir.2004).

Campos-Perez’s contention that she has been defrauded by an immigration consultant is foreclosed by Hernandez v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1014, 1020 (9th Cir.2008) (holding that “reliance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.