Tuvalu Fausia v. Mathew Cates

Good Law
448 F. App'x 682
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 201110-55974California234 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Tuvalu Tutuila Fausia, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his Americans with Disabilities Act and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay the initial partial filing fee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s decision to impose a partial filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 , and its dismissal for failure to pay. Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir.2002). We reverse and remand.

The district court abused its discretion by dismissing Fausia’s action for failure to pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $20.20, because Fausia had no available funds with which to pay the fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (b)(4) (“In no event shall a prisoner be prohibited from bringing a civil action or appealing a civil or criminal judgment for the reason that the prisoner has no assets and no means by which to pay the initial partial filing fee.”); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850 (district court cannot dismiss in forma pauperis prisoner’s case based on his failure to pay initial partial fee when his failure to pay is due to lack of available funds when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.