In Re Bluetooth Headset Products Liability

Good Law
654 F.3d 935
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 201109-56683California6,821 words

Opinion

Opinion

Theodore H. Frank, Center for Class Action Fairness, Washington, D.C., for the objectors-appellants.

Daniel L. Warshaw, Pearson, Simon Warshaw & Penny, Sherman Oaks, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellees.

Terrence J. Dee, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, for the defendants-appellees.

Before: MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges, and JACK ZOUHARY, [*] District Judge.

HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:

The settlement agreement approved in this products liability class action provides the class $100,000 in cy pres awards and zero dollars for economic injury, while setting aside up to $800,000 for class counsel and $12,000 for the class representatives — amounts which the court subsequently awarded in full in a separate order. William Brennan and other class members (collectively "Objectors") challenge the fairness and reasonableness of the settlement and appeal both the approval and fee orders, arguing the district court abused its discretion in failing to consider whether the gross disproportion between the class award and the negotiated fee award was reasonable. We agree that the disparity between the value of the class recovery and class counsel's compensation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.