Flexible Lifeline Systems., Inc. v. Precision Lift, Inc.

Bad Law
654 F.3d 989·2011 WL 3659315·99 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1837·2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17462
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 201110-35987California5,698 words

Opinion

Opinion

Defendants-appellants John Tollenaere and Precision Lift, Inc. (collectively “Precision”) appeal from the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction against them in an action for copyright infringement by plaintiff-appellee Flexible Lifeline Systems, Inc. (“Flexible”). The district court found that Flexible was likely to succeed in its infringement suit, and granted the injunction relying on long-standing precedent of this circuit that presumes irreparable harm in a copyright infringement case upon a showing of likelihood of success on the merits. Precision appeals, claiming that such a presumption runs afoul of two recent Supreme Court decisions, eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388 , 126 S.Ct. 1837 , 164 L.Ed.2d 641 (2006) and Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 , 129 S.Ct. 365 , 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008). We agree, and therefore vacate the injunction and remand.

BACKGROUND

John Tollenaere formed Precision in the 1990s to market a helicopter rescue lift product he had patented. In or around 2000, Precision expanded its business to include sales of aircraft maintenance stands and platforms for fixed- and rotorwing aircraft.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.