Mario Pereira Galvez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
448 F. App'x 693
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 201108-70947California228 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Mario Antonio Pereira Galvez and his family, natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely because the motion was filed more than 18 months after the BIA’s final decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c), and petitioners did not establish prima facie eligibility for relief, see Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 996-97 (9th Cir.2008) (evidence must demonstrate prima facie eligibility for relief warranting reopening based on changed country conditions).

Petitioners’ contention that the BIA failed to consider their eligibility for relief based on membership in a particular social group or an imputed political opinion is not supported by the record. Accordingly, petitioners’ due process claim also fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.