Olff

Olff v. East Side Union High School District

Good Law
305 F. Supp. 557·1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10054
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 196952282California573 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peckham, J.

ORDER

Plaintiff Olff brings an action in this Court for injunctive and declaratory relief to redress the deprivation of a Fourteenth Amendment right, and to obtain damages. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 .

Plaintiff is a fifteen-year-old student in good standing at James Lick High School, East Side Union High School District, San Jose, California. On September 10, 1969, plaintiff was informed by a school official that he would not be permitted to attend classes until he had his hair cut, because his hair style and length violated a regulation of the East Side Union High School District, which states in pertinent part:

There is little question that school authorities have a legitimate governmental interest in promulgating regulations in order to insure the safety and welfare of high school students. It is a reasonable health regulation to require that a boy’s hair be “clean.” It would also seem to be a reasonable safety regulation were the school district to specify the circumstances when a boy’s hair must be of a certain length, e. g., in a welding class, in an automotive class, in a woodworking class, etc.

But such is not the case here.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.