Bennett

Bennett v. Procunier

Good Law
1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 2371·262 Cal. App. 2d 799·69 Cal. Rptr. 116
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 7, 1968Civ. 924California771 words

Opinion

Opinion

Conley, J.

This appeal tests the question whether the time spent by a defendant in a diagnostic facility of the Department of Corrections prior to judgment must he credited to the defendant on his sentence. Frank Hale Bennett petitioned the Superior Court of Kern County for a writ of mandate ordering the prison officials to give credit on the sentence of the defendant for the 90 days spent by him pursuant to court order in the diagnostic facility at Chino State Prison from January 6, 1965, through April 6, 1965. He had been convicted of a felony in the Superior Court of Riverside County. Before sentence, he was ordered to the diagnostic center pursuant to section 1203.03 of the Penal Code. The purpose of this provision is to inform the trial judge before sentence of facts helpful to him in deciding whether probation is merited or what sentence is justified; it is generally considered advantageous to the person convicted. Upon the expiration of the 90-day period, he was returned to the Superior Court of Riverside County and was then sentenced to prison for the period prescribed by law for the crime as to which he had been convicted. This sentencing took place on April 9, 1965. At that time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.