County of Contra Costa v. East Bay Municipal Utility District

Caution
1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1018·229 Cal. App. 2d 556·40 Cal. Rptr. 495
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 1964Civ. 21331California5,114 words

Opinion

Opinion

Molinari, J.

Defendants, East Bay Municipal Utility District and Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, bodies corporate and politic of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as “Utility District” and “Transit District,” respectively, appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, The County of Contra Costa, hereinafter referred to as “the County,” for a share of election expenses charged to such districts as a result of the consolidation of certain elections called by them.

Questions Presented

1. Is Utility District legally obligated to pay the County a share of the costs of the June 3, 1958 special bond election?

2. Is Utility District legally obligated to pay to the County a share of the costs of the November 4, 1958 and November 8, 1960 district directors’ election?

3. Is Transit District legally obligated to pay to the County a share of the costs of the November 8, 1960 district directors ’ election ?

The Record

The case comes to us upon the following agreed statement of facts:

Utility District and Transit District called and ordered, as required by law, the following specified district elections which were, as required by law, consolidated by the County with the following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.