Stransky

Sequoia Vacuum Systems v. Stransky

Good Law
1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1525·229 Cal. App. 2d 281·40 Cal. Rptr. 203
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 1964Civ. 21557California2,510 words

Opinion

Opinion

Taylor, J.

This is an appeal by defendant, Malcolm Stransky, from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Sequoia Vacuum Systems and Arthur C. White, in an action for unfair competition and breach of fiduciary duty. Appellant Stransky and the other defendants were charged with certain concealed activities on behalf of respondents' competitor, defendant Beamco. The complaint, charging violations of fiduciary duties and certain trade secrets, prayed for an injunction restraining appellant and other defendants from continuing to compete and for compensatory and punitive damages.

The trial court found that appellant, while a director and officer of respondent corporation, entered into a competing business and used his position of trust and confidence to further his own private interests, and concluded that, in concealing his actions, appellant was guilty of a breach of his fiduciary relationship. The judgment against appellant granted the injunctive relief requested and awarded respondents actual damages of $1,600 and exemplary damages of $5,000. The court entered judgment in favor of the other defendants.

The contentions on appeal concern the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.