Mattern

Mattern v. Carberry

Good Law
186 Cal. App. 2d 570·1960 Cal. App. LEXIS 1669·9 Cal. Rptr. 137
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 22, 1960Civ. 19198California1,139 words

Opinion

Opinion

Shoemaker, J.

Defendants and appellants Edward Pierce and Betty Pierce appeal from a default judgment enjoining an execution sale of plaintiff and respondent Ida Mattern’s real property.

The facts are without dispute. Respondent took title to the property in question by a grant deed from Bertie Parkhurst executed April 1, 1950, and recorded on April 24, 1950. On July 6, 1950, the appellants Pierce brought suit in the Superior Court of Marin County against Parkhurst on an indebtedness that had existed for some time prior to April 1, 1950, and were awarded a judgment on January 31, 1952, in said action. The respondent was not a party to that action and the appellants did not have a judgment against her.

The appellants Pierce also filed suit against respondent and Parkhurst in the San Francisco Superior Court on January 10, 1952, to set aside the conveyance as fraudulent. That action was dismissed in September 1957 by the court for failure to bring it to trial within five years after filing. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.)

The defendant Carberry, Sheriff of the City and County of San Francisco, acting under a writ of execution issued out of the Superior Court of Marin County, levied execution upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.