Shifrin

Shifrin v. McGuire & Hester Construction Co.

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1776·239 Cal. App. 2d 420·48 Cal. Rptr. 799
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 1966Civ. 22347California2,615 words

Opinion

Opinion

Taylor, J.

On this appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in their favor for $1,747 property damages in excess of insurance coverage, the contentions are that the trial court erred by: 1) instructing the jury to subtract from the total damages sustained the amount of $81,633.19 received by plaintiffs from their insurer; 2) excluding certain evidence; 3) allowing the jury to view two other apartment buildings; and 4) rejecting their claim for attorney fees.

As no contentions are raised concerning the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment, a brief summary is sufficient. On February 20, 1962, plaintiffs’ 17-unit apartment house in Mountain View was severely damaged by a gas fire and explosion, for which defendants, McGuire & Hester Construction Company, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and the City of Mountain View, admitted responsibility. At the time of the loss, plaintiffs were covered by a standard form fire insurance policy issued by Northern Insurance Company of New York (hereafter referred to as Northern) for a specified maximum coverage of $151,500 for property damage and $11,700 for loss of rental income.

After the fire and explosion, plaintiff,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.