McClatchey

McClatchey v. Rudd

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1801·239 Cal. App. 2d 605·48 Cal. Rptr. 783
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1966Civ. 7663California1,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

Finley, J.

Appellant is the administrator of the estate of Paul W. McClatchey, deceased. Pursuant to the filing of demurrers to his original and first amended complaints, appellant amended. Upon the sustaining of a general demurrer to his second amended complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action, appellant failed or refused to amend and a judgment of dismissal was entered.

The second amended complaint is in three counts. Each is founded upon an allegedly unlawful sale under a deed of trust of certain real property belonging to the deceased.

The first count charges that the sale was unfairly and fraudulently conducted because the beneficiary and the trustee knew that appellant, as the trustor’s successor, had not received mailed notice of the sale proceeding; that the price bid by the purchaser was disproportionate to the true value of the property and the actions of the beneficiary and trustee constituted a forfeiture which should be set aside.

The second count charges a breach of trust by the trustee based upon the trustee’s alleged actual knowledge that the notices mailed to the deceased were returned marked “Deceased,” and that the trustee knew that appellant, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.