Nuclear Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. William C. Cornell Co.

Good Law
1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1079·239 Cal. App. 2d 8·48 Cal. Rptr. 416
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 1965Civ. 22302California1,936 words

Opinion

Opinion

Shoemaker, J.

On February 20, 1964, plaintiff Nuclear Electronic Laboratories, Incorporated, obtained, ex parte, a temporary restraining order and an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be issued. The temporary restraining order enjoined defendants William C. Cornell Company, William C. Cornell, and Lenroc Company, from manufacturing, selling or advertising the “Lenroc Tester ’ ’ for sale; from claiming that plaintiff did not own or was not entitled to manufacture or sell the “PCV Tester”; and from seeking in another court any order prohibiting plaintiff from manufacturing or selling the “PCV Tester.”

Bond on the temporary restraining order was fixed at $2,000 and was subsequently raised to $10,000 upon application by defendants.

Sometime prior to March 3, 1964, defendants applied for a preliminary injunction and also moved for an order dissolving the temporary restraining order. Plaintiff’s and defendants’ applications for a preliminary injunction were heard by the court on March 3 and 4, 1964. In an order made in open court on the latter date and signed on May 6, 1964, the court found that neither side should be granted a preliminary injunction, that the temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.