Crawford

Crawford v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1822·239 Cal. App. 2d 791·49 Cal. Rptr. 115
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 1966Civ. 11059California3,869 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pierce, J.

In this plaintiff’s appeal in an action for wrongful death (medical malpractice) we hold that the trial court was justified in granting a nonsuit in favor of defendant county.

The principal contention that a “conditional” res ipsa loquitur situation existed, viz., that death was the probable result of the negligence of defendant’s anesthetist, fails because medical testimony neither established nor furnished evidence from which a lay jury could reasonably infer the probability of such negligence. A second contention that there was evidence other than the res ipsa inference sufficient to take the case to the jury and a third contention that evidence of an asserted admission by an intern (not present in surgery) was improperly excluded are also untenable.

Re: The Contention that Bes Ipsa Loquitur Applied.

On October 12, 1962, plaintiff’s decedent, Fayrene Crawford, suffered an ankle fracture. She was taken to the defendant county hospital where a closed reduction was performed under a general anesthetic—sodium pentothal with nitrous oxide. The anesthesia was administered and the other functions pertaining thereto were performed by an anesthetist, a registered nurse, employed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.