Martines
People v. Martines
Opinion
Opinion
Roth, J.
Appellant was convicted of violating Health and Safety Code, section 11530, possession of marijuana. No question of the sufficiency of the evidence is raised; appellant’s sole ground for reversal is the inadmissibility of the contraband because of an illegal search and seizure.
On July 21, 1963, at 1:15 a.m., Officers Germann and Rosenbroek, while patrolling a high-frequency burglary area, noticed appellant and two companions walking through an unlighted alley at the rear of a closed business area. The officers stopped and asked appellant for some identification. He stated that he had none. Officer Germann testified that he then made a cursory search, "due to the darkness in the alley and for my own safety, ...” This was a search merely of the outside of appellant’s clothing.
“As I ran my hands over his left pants pocket, left front pants pocket, I felt a hard object and an object below that, which felt like it was a knife. At that time I went into defendant Martinez’s [sic] pocket....”
The officer continued: “As I reached into the defendant [appellant] Martinez’s [sic] pocket, front pants pocket, in an effort to remove the knife I first removed what felt like a wad of paper. I…