Reed

Magna Development Co. v. Reed

Good Law
1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1074·228 Cal. App. 2d 230·39 Cal. Rptr. 284
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 26, 1964Civ. 21317California5,558 words

Opinion

Opinion

Molinari, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a summary judgment in favor of defendants. The question presented is whether the trial court was justified in granting the motion of defendants for a summary judgment. The consideration of this question turns essentially upon whether a subordination clause in an agreement for the sale of real property is uncertain as a matter of law.

The Record

Plaintiff's second amended complaint for specific performance alleges that on January 4, 1962, plaintiff and defendants entered into a written agreement wherein defendants promised to sell to plaintiff and plaintiff promised to purchase from defendants certain described real property. It is further alleged that the agreement provides that plaintiff will pay no money down but will execute its promissory note payable to defendants for the amount of the purchase price with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent per annum payable semiannually; that the note is due and payable at the end of five years from its date unless defendants desire to have the note run for an additional five-year period in which event the interest shall continue at the same rate and the principal thereof shall be payable in five…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.