Estate of Gopcevic

Good Law
228 Cal. App. 2d 280·39 Cal. Rptr. 482
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1964Civ. No. 21590California622 words

Opinion

Opinion

Draper, J.

Four of the five beneficiaries of the testamentary trust which received the residue of this estate employed appellant attorneys, in part to resist the application of the executors and their attorneys for extraordinary fees totalling $100,000. Appellants investigated the issue and negotiated with the executors' attorneys. The probate court allowed $57,435, rather than the $100,000 originally sought. There was no contested hearing, and appellants allege that the lower fee was the result of "negotiated adjustment" with the executors and their attorneys. Appellants then sought payment from the estate, as an expense of administration, of fees of $9,500 for their services in negotiating the reduction. The probate court found that appellants' services were rendered for their clients "and did not benefit the estate." Appellants' petition was denied. [1] Unquestionably, a probate court may apply the equitable principle that one who incurs expense for counsel fees in protecting, preserving or increasing a fund, for the benefit of himself and others, may be reimbursed from the fund, thus compelling all who benefit to bear their share of the fair cost of such litigation ( Estate of Reade, 31…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.