Frey

People v. Frey

Good Law
1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1057·228 Cal. App. 2d 33·39 Cal. Rptr. 49
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 1964Crim. 9012California9,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kincaid, J.

By information filed, appellant Karl Frey and certain codefendants were charged with pimping and pandering and conspiring to commit these offenses.

The first count (conspiracy, in violation of Pen. Code, § 182) charges appellant Frey, Robert Kittridge, Jr., hereinafter called “Kittridge,” and Jack Phillips, hereinafter called “Phillips,” with conspiring and agreeing together, and with other persons, to commit the crimes of pimping and pandering. Six overt acts are charged in furtherance of the conspiracy which is alleged to have continued during the period between the latter part of 1959 and December 2,1961.

Count 2 charges appellant and Kittridge with pimping, in violation of section 266h of the Penal Code, and involving one Anita Hodge Wong, hereinafter called “Anita.”

Count 3 charges appellant and Kittridge with pandering, in violation of section 266i of the Penal Code, and likewise involving Anita.

Count 4 charges Frey, Kittridge and Phillips with pandering and involving one Shirley Doupnik, hereinafter called “Shirley.”

Count 5 charges these same three defendants with pandering involving Shirley.

The six overt acts referred to name the defendants and Anita, Shirley, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.