Hildebrand

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hildebrand

Good Law
1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1206·238 Cal. App. 2d 859·48 Cal. Rptr. 339
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 1965Civ. 27764California1,318 words

Opinion

Opinion

Roth, J.

This appeal is by defendants Hildebrand, Bills, McLeod, Daggett, Dragmire, Bockhold and the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen (appellants) from a consent judgment for a permanent injunction rendered and entered in favor of plaintiffs The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company and Southern Pacific Company, respondents herein.

Respondents’ amended complaints (the originals were filed July 23, 1959) allege that appellants Hildebrand, Bills, McLeod and Daggett were attorneys licensed to practice law in the State of California; that the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen is an international labor union; and that appellants Dragmire and Bockhold were members of said union. They further allege that a conspiracy existed among all of the appellants to divert improperly the damage claims of injured employees to appellants’ attorneys for processing in violation of rules 2, 3 and 11 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California; that in furtherance of this conspiracy they improperly solicited hundreds of persons whose names are listed on a separate exhibit; that the acts of appellants were disruptive and destructive of good employer-employee relationships between…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.