Schermerhorn

Federal Mutual Insurance v. Schermerhorn

Good Law
1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1212·238 Cal. App. 2d 900·48 Cal. Rptr. 325
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1965Civ. 22320California1,265 words

Opinion

Opinion

Agee, J.

On December 10, 1960, Patricia Schermerhorn was injured as the result of a collision between an automobile in which she was riding and a pickup truck owned and being driven by George Matsunaga.

Allstate Insurance Company had issued a public liability insurance policy on another vehicle owned by Matsunaga but there was no existing policy on the pickup truck. However, the Allstate policy contained a “temporary substitute” clause and Matsunaga claimed coverage of the pickup truck under its provisions. Allstate denied such coverage.

Federal Mutual Insurance Company had issued a public liability insurance policy on the automobile in which Schermerhorn was riding. It provided uninsured motorists’ coverage and contained a provision to settle by arbitration any controversy relating to liability or damages arising under such coverage.

On February 25, 1964, Schermerhorn requested arbitration under this provision and caused a hearing to be scheduled before the American Arbitration Association for May 28, 1964.

On April 15, 1964 Federal filed the within action against Allstate, Matsunaga and Schermerhorn, seeking a declaration of whether Allstate’s policy covered Matsunaga’s pickup…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.