Gillis

Gillis v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.

Good Law
1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1153·238 Cal. App. 2d 408·47 Cal. Rptr. 868·25 A.L.R. 3d 564
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 1965Civ. 22482California6,962 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Defendant insurer has appealed from a judgment, following trial by the court, which awarded plaintiff, as assignee of the alleged insured under its policy, the sum of $3,365.03, together with interest from April 18, 1963, on account of a loss which the trial court found came within the provisions of the policy.

Appellant contends that the owner of the property, which is one of plaintiff’s assignors, was not a party to the contract of insurance; that the loss was one which is excluded by the terms of the policy; and that the damages are erroneously computed. The foregoing contentions are accompanied by specific assignments of alleged errors of the lower court in making its findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in failing to find as requested by appellant.

An examination of the record reflects that the findings of fact made by the trial court, and its conclusions of law and the judgment which are predicated thereon are, with the exception of a minor adjustment to the amount of damages, sustained by the evidence and the applicable law.

The pertinent facts, as set forth in the findings and where disputed, as reflected by the evidence, are as follows:

During the period from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.