In Re Nina P.

Good Law
26 Cal. App. 4th 615·31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 687
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1994A059449California5,489 words

Opinion

Opinion

[Opinion certified for partial publication. [*] ]

OPINION

KLINE, P.J.

Appellant Laura C. appeals a juvenile court order establishing a legal guardianship for her daughter Nina P. Although she raises other issues, appellant's chief contention is that the court erred in changing the permanent plan from long-term foster care to guardianship without the filing of a petition for modification pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 388. [1]

As we shall explain, we have determined that the department of social services (DSS), the parents and any other interested parties must file a petition under section 388 to seek modification of an existing order; however, we ultimately conclude the error in this case was harmless and thus does not require reversal. Finding the remaining contentions unpersuasive, we shall affirm the judgment.

The minor, Nina P., was born on December 11, 1983, to appellant and Patrick W. Nina lived with her mother; when her mother married Matt C., he moved in with them. On December 4, 1990, a petition was filed pursuant to section 300, subdivision (a), alleging Nina was in need of protection. Specifically, the petition alleged that Nina's stepfather had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.