Brooks

People v. Brooks

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 678·26 Cal. App. 4th 142·31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 283·94 Daily Journal DAR 9365·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5079
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 1994E011679California3,122 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ramirez, J.

— A jury convicted Marquibe Lonnell Brooks of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)), threatening to commit a crime which would result in great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 422), and dissuading a witness (Pen. Code, § 136.1, subd. (c)(2)). As to the first two offenses, the jury further found that Brooks committed them for the benefit of a street gang. (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b).) He was sentenced to prison and appeals, claiming the trial court erroneously instructed the jury, failed to bifurcate the gang allegation and sentenced him. He also contends that his stipulation concerning the gang allegation was invalid. In supplemental briefing, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to support one of his convictions. We agree only with Brooks’s contention about the gang allegation stipulation and one of his jury instruction arguments, as it relates to one of the counts. Therefore, we reverse that count and the gang allegations. This necessitates a resentencing of Brooks, which moots his sentencing arguments. We affirm his remaining convictions.

Facts

The victim testified that she witnessed a robbery perpetrated by members of the 12th Street…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.