Link

People v. Link

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 758·26 Cal. App. 4th 1272·32 Cal. Rptr. 2d 149·94 Daily Journal DAR 10172·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5614
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 20, 1994C015878California2,565 words

Opinion

Opinion

Davis, J.

— After the trial court denied his suppression motion, defendant pied no contest to charges of drug and firearm possession. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11055, subd. (d)(2), 11377; Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a).) The court granted probation with the condition that defendant serve a nine-month jail term (which was stayed pending appeal). Defendant renews his efforts to quash the search warrants and to suppress evidence. We shall affirm.

Facts

At the hearing on the defendant’s motion, the court received the testimony of several witnesses, and the parties placed in evidence the two search warrants involved in the case and their supporting documentation. As the defendant does not renew on appeal his effort to traverse the search warrants, the testimony we recount in the unpublished section of these facts is primarily limited to the facts preceding the execution of the first search warrant, while the published section details the facts leading up to the second search warrant.

A.

B.

On October 23, 1991, law enforcement authorities executed the first search warrant at approximately 9 a.m. Agent Power and Detective Betts assumed responsibility for “structure #1”; Officer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.