Jones

Jones v. Superior Court

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 641·26 Cal. App. 4th 92·31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 264·94 Daily Journal DAR 8744·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4804
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 23, 1994D020373California3,654 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

— In this case, we are asked to determine the propriety of imposing sanctions on a petition for writ of mandate and request for stay. Sanctions are warranted where counsel omits critical facts intending to create a sense of emergency solely for delay. Because, however, we believe the omissions here were unintended, a product of time pressures combined with short-sighted advocacy, we refrain from imposing sanctions.

Factual and Procedural Background

This petition involves a death penalty case where Principal Attorney Deborah Carson (Carson), a deputy alternate public defender with significant experience in capital cases, had the flu when trial was set to start on January 21, 1994.

On January 10, Carson left work with a fever. On January 14, she informed the trial court she was ill, submitted a doctor’s note advising her not to work from January 17 through 21 and stated she might need a continuance; but the court was firm that jury selection would begin on January 21. After some rest and a return to work, Carson had a relapse, saw her doctor on January 20, and obtained a letter from the doctor saying she had acute influenza and was disabled until January 30.

On January…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.