Shin

Dong Suk Shin v. Superior Court

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 682·26 Cal. App. 4th 542·31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 587·94 Daily Journal DAR 9355·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5143
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 1994B079319California4,908 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

Introduction

Korea First Bank (KFB) obtained a summary adjudication permitting it to obtain a judicial foreclosure and deficiency judgment against petitioners Dong Suk Shin, Byung Kook Cheon, and Jung Soon Cheon. Petitioners then applied to this court seeking a writ of mandate to vacate that ruling on the ground that KFB had violated the “one form of action” provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 726, subdivision (a) by obtaining a prejudgment attachment against Korean real property owned by petitioner Shin. We issued an alternative writ, stayed enforcement of the contested order, and set the matter for hearing. Having heard oral argument and reviewed the parties’ pleadings, we grant the requested relief.

Factual Background

On June 14, 1990, in Los Angeles, California, KFB loaned $9.6 million. Petitioners signed a promissory note secured by a deed of trust on California real property. Petitioners defaulted on the promissory note by failing to make interest payments for August 15, 1991, and each month thereafter. KFB elected to accelerate the note and demanded payment of the full principal with interest and late charges totaling $10,263,341.66.

On May 22, 1992,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.