People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commisson v. Smith

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 658·26 Cal. App. 4th 113·31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 488·94 Daily Journal DAR 8863·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4882
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 1994A059257California7,766 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

— We uphold an injunction under the McAteer-Petris Act (Gov. Code, § 66600 et seq.; the Act) against the offshore mooring of certain vessels in Richardson Bay as constituting “fill” for which permits from the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) are required under section 66632, subdivision (a) of the Act. We also reverse the denial of relief against the mooring of one other vessel.

Background

This action began as one for writ of mandate and declaratory relief against the Richardson Bay Regional Agency (a local joint powers agency), its constituent local governments of Mill Valley, Sausalito, Tiburón, Belvedere and Marin County, and some local officials. Vessel owners and operators suing as individuals and unincorporated associations calling themselves “The Mariners of Richardson Bay” and “Richardson Bay Community Association” filed suit in March 1988 to bar enforcement of a regional agency ordinance (No. 87-1) which, among other things, prohibited the offshore mooring of residential-use vessels in Richardson Bay and Belvedere Cove for periods longer than 30 days. BCDC intervened as a defendant to protect its interest in enforcement of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.