Kaplan

Kaplan v. Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates, Inc.

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 976·59 Cal. App. 4th 741·69 Cal. Rptr. 2d 640·97 Daily Journal DAR 14413·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8958
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 1997B107510California1,934 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

In this action for real estate fraud, Leon S. Kaplan appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates, Inc. (Coldwell Banker). (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (c).) The trial court ruled there were no triable facts that would cause Coldwell Banker to be liable for the acts or omissions of a real estate broker who independently owned and operated a Coldwell Banker franchise. We conclude that a triable issue of fact is present with respect to ostensible agency. We therefore reverse.

Facts and Proceedings

Appellant purchased three parcels of agricultural property from Albert La Monte, Jr., and Helen La Monte for approximately $1 million. He later discovered that the property was not as represented. Appellant, a superior court judge, was an experienced investor and had employed real estate brokers in other transactions. Before purchasing the property, he had been involved in the purchase or sale of an office building, some storefront commercial property, five single-family residences, an apartment building, and commercial property.

Appellant filed suit against the La Montes and their real estate broker, Gerald Adams and Land…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.