Womack

Womack v. San Francisco Community College District

Good Law
147 Cal. App. 4th 854·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 206·2007 Daily Journal DAR 2159·54 Cal. Rptr. 3d 558·2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1716
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 2007A112564California5,067 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haerle, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for a writ of mandate brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1085. By that petition, he sought to compel respondents to reinstate him as a regular employee in the respondent San Francisco Community College District’s (hereafter District) English as a second language (ESL) department on the basis that the prior level of his work in that department had altered his status from that of a “temporary employee” to one of a “contract employee” who could not be terminated in the manner or timeframe he was in 2001. The trial court denied the motion on two grounds: (1) under the applicable statutes, appellant’s status had not, in fact, changed and he was thus still a temporary employee as of the date of his termination; and (2) laches. We agree with the trial court on both grounds and hence affirm.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Christopher Womack was hired by the District as a temporary instructor of ESL in the fall of 1987; at that time the ESL subject was taught within the English department of the college; it became a separate and distinct department in 1990. He continued to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.