Bostick

Bostick v. Flex Equip. Co., Inc.

Good Law
147 Cal. App. 4th 80·54 Cal. Rptr. 3d 28
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 2007B171567, B173455California25,384 words

Opinion

Opinion

No appearance for Cross-complainant and Respondent.

Certified for Partial Publication. [*]

ALDRICH, J.

Harold L. Bostick suffered severe, disabling injuries while working out at Gold's Gym, Inc. (Gold's Gym) on weight-lifting equipment manufactured by Flex Equipment Company, Inc. (Flex). Bostick sued both Flex and Gold's Gym. Gold's Gym cross-complained against Flex for equitable indemnity. The cross-complaint was severed for separate trial. Prior to the conclusion of the trial on the complaint, Bostick entered into a settlement with Gold's Gym for $7.3 million. The jury returned a verdict awarding Bostick nearly $3.3 million in economic damages and $13 million in noneconomic damages, and later awarded $1 in punitive damages. The jury apportioned 90 percent of the fault to Flex, 10 percent to Bostick, and 0 percent fault to "other entities." The trial court reduced Bostick's award against Flex by the full amount of the $7.3 million settlement and entered a judgment in favor of Bostick. Thereafter, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Gold's Gym on its cross-complaint against Flex for equitable indemnity in the full amount of the $7.3 million settlement.

Both Flex and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.