Balthazor

Balthazor v. Little League Baseball, Inc.

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 194·62 Cal. App. 4th 47·72 Cal. Rptr. 2d 337·98 Daily Journal DAR 2565·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1843
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 1998G017227California2,124 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallin, J.

Ryan Balthazor and his mother sued Saddleback Little League and Little League Baseball, Inc. (collectively the League) for injuries sustained by Balthazor when he was struck by a wild pitch during a baseball game. An arbitrator ruled in their favor; the League requested a trial de novo. The trial court granted the League’s request for summary judgment, concluding recovery was barred by the doctrine of primary assumption of risk, as set forth by our Supreme Court in Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296 [ 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 2 , 834 P.2d 696 ]. Balthazor and his mother appeal contending the League increased the risks inherent in the game, making this a case of secondary assumption of risk instead. Therefore, there were material issues of fact making summary judgment improper. We affirm.

On April 3, 1991, 11-year-old Balthazor was playing in a League-sponsored baseball game. The record does not reflect when the game began, but the teams were still playing at 6:00 p.m. Balthazor’s mother testified it was a clear day and the sun was up when the game began, but it was getting difficult to see when Balthazor went to bat around 6:10 p.m. The field had no lights. An almanac indicated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.