Pazderka

Pazderka v. Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc.

Bad Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 243·62 Cal. App. 4th 658·73 Cal. Rptr. 2d 242·98 Daily Journal DAR 2992·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2161
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 1998A078278California4,447 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lambden, J.

Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc. (CDA) made an offer to compromise to Franti and Julie Pazderka (Pazderkas) pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998, which the Pazderkas accepted. (All further unspecified code sections refer to the Code of Civil Procedure.) The Pazderkas presented the signed agreement to the clerk of the superior court, who entered judgment pursuant to section 998. The Pazderkas, thereafter, successfully moved for an award of attorneys’ fees. CDA filed a motion which, among other things, requested reconsideration of the award for attorneys’ fees, relief from judgment, and rescission.

The trial court granted reconsideration and vacated the judgment, and the Pazderkas appeal from the order granting this relief. The Pazderkas contend that the trial court did not have jurisdiction, because CDA had filed a notice of appeal prior to the trial court’s issuing its decision. Additionally, the Pazderkas argue that the trial court had no jurisdiction to grant reconsideration, and it abused its discretion in vacating the judgment, because CDA failed to present facts or law to support such relief.

Thus, the questions posed by this appeal are: Is an order pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.