Meller & Snyder v. R & T PROPERTIES, INC.

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 303·62 Cal. App. 4th 1303·73 Cal. Rptr. 2d 740·98 Daily Journal DAR 3553·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2600
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 7, 1998B102700California7,075 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. Introduction

R & T Properties, Inc. (defendant), appeals from a judgment against it and in favor of Meller & Snyder (plaintiff), a law firm, in a joint debtor proceeding pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 989 et seq. The trial court found defendant, a corporation, was jointly liable on a prior judgment against Robert Tieger, an individual. We reverse the judgment. We conclude the trial court erred in failing to resolve the question whether plaintiff properly amended the complaint to substitute R & T Properties, Inc., for a fictitiously named defendant. Further, we conclude defendant is correct in arguing that its due process rights were violated when it was denied the opportunity to contest the merits of the underlying complaint.

II. Substantive and Procedural History

Plaintiff filed a complaint for contract breach and related claims on August 17, 1989, against Mr. Tieger, individually and doing business as R & T Properties. Also, plaintiff named five fictitiously named defendants designated as “Does 1 through 5.” The complaint alleged: Mr. Tieger, and Does 1 through 5, had entered into an oral agreement pursuant to which plaintiff agreed to render legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.