Cooley

Cooley v. Superior Court

Good Law
107 Cal. Rptr. 2d 724·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 409·2001 Daily Journal DAR 5474·89 Cal. App. 4th 785·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4470
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2001B148019California2,561 words

Opinion

Opinion

Armstrong, J.

In proceedings authorized by Welfare and Institutions Code section 6600 et seq., the district attorney petitions for an extraordinary writ of mandate. He seeks an order directing the trial court not to hold a scheduled probable cause hearing on a petition to recommit real party as a sexually violent predator. We conclude that the trial court correctly interpreted the Sexually Violent Predators Act as ensuring real party in interest a probable cause hearing, and so deny the petition.

Facts and Procedural History

Real party in interest Dwayne Edwards was civilly committed as a sexually violent predator (SVP) on July 6, 1998. That is, a jury found he had been convicted of a sexually violent offense against two or more victims and that he suffered from a mental disorder making him likely to engage in sexually violent criminal behavior. (§ 6600, subd. (a).) He was committed for a period of two years, the maximum allowed under the SVP statute, to Atascadero State Hospital, where he was to receive a program of treatment. (§§ 6604.1, subd. (a), 6606, subd. (a).) As the commitment period drew to a close, the district attorney filed a petition to commit Edwards for another…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.