Romero

Romero v. Superior Court

Good Law
107 Cal. Rptr. 2d 801·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 438·2001 Daily Journal DAR 5830·89 Cal. App. 4th 1068·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4804
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 2001D036580California11,177 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

Plaintiff and real party in interest Ryan N. (Ryan), then 13 years of age, was sexually assaulted by another minor, defendant Joseph W. (Joseph) who was then 16 years of age, while both teenagers were visiting a teenage son of petitioners and defendants Nicanor Romero and Gail Romero (together petitioners or the Romeros) in petitioners’ home. Ryan’s mother, real party in interest Marcellyn W. (mother or Ryan’s mother), brought Ryan to the Romeros’ home and left her there after telling Gail Romero that she did not leave her child anywhere without adult supervision, and Gail Romero replied that she and her husband would be at home gardening. Mother, however, gave permission for Ryan to walk with Joseph and other teenagers that afternoon from petitioners’ home to a drugstore without adult supervision. Later that afternoon, Joseph sexually assaulted Ryan after petitioners left their home for an hour to buy pizza for the teens.

Ryan and her mother (together plaintiffs) sued the Romeros for negligent supervision and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Romeros brought a motion for summary judgment or, alternatively, for summary adjudication, arguing (among other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.