Covenant Care, Inc. v. Superior Court

Good Law
107 Cal. Rptr. 2d 291·89 Cal. App. 4th 928
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 2001B145406California7,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

Houck & Balisok, Russell S. Balisok, Steven Wilheim, Glendale, and Patricia L. Canner, for Real Parties in Interest Lourdes M. Inclan and Juan C. Inclan.

No appearance for Respondent.

MIRIAM A. VOGEL, J.

Lourdes M. Inclan and Juan C. Inclan sued Covenant Care California, Inc. (and Covenant Care, Inc.) for damages arising from the allegedly negligent care, treatment, and death of their father, Juan A. Inclan, at a hospice facility owned and operated by Covenant Care. [1] More than two years later, the Inclans sought leave to file an amended pleading in which they alleged willful misconduct, elder abuse, and other intentional torts, and in which they asked for punitive damages. Covenant Care objected, contending (among other things) that the claim for punitive damages was time barred. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 425.13 [in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, the court shall not allow an amendment that includes a claim for punitive damages if the motion for such an order is not filed within two years after the complaint is filed].) [2] The trial court rejected Covenant Care's argument and accepted the Inclans' assertion that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.